<Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This section does not cite any sources . Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed . (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This section does not cite any sources . Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed . (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) </Td> </Tr> <P> The main difference between a common law title and a Torrens title is that a member of the general community, acting in good faith, can rely on the information on the land register as to the rights and interests of parties recorded there, and act on the basis of that information . A prospective purchaser, for example, is not required to look beyond that record . He or she does not need even to examine the Certificate of Title, the register information being paramount . This contrasts with a common law title, which is based on the principle that a vendor cannot transfer to a purchaser a greater interest than he or she owns . As with a chain, the seller's title is as good as the weakest link of the chain of title . Accordingly, if a vendor's common law title is defective in any way, so would be the purchaser's title . Hence, it is incumbent on the purchaser to ensure that the vendor's title is beyond question . This may involve both inquiries and an examination of the chain of title, which can be a protracted and costly exercise each time there is a dealing in the property . </P> <P> The registered proprietor of Torrens land is said to have an indefeasible title, which means that only in very limited circumstances (see following) can his or her title be challenged . </P>

One of the unique features of the torrens system of recording is that
find me the text answering this question