<P> "It shall be unlawful to...manage or control any place...and knowingly and intentionally...make available for use...the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance". </P> <P> Currently, there are no official, state - sanctioned Safe Injection Sites operating in the United States, but many cities are working on gaining approval . In January 2017, a bill was introduced in favor of legalizing Safe Injection Sites in California . In the bill, Assemblywoman Susan Eggman sought for the authorization of these facilities, otherwise known as "drug consumption programs", in various cities / counties across California, including Los Angeles and San Francisco . Although the bill passed through the Assembly and various committees, it failed by 2 votes on the Senate Floor . In Washington, similar efforts were made to open up these facilities in Seattle and King County, but were also met with strong opposition . In January 2017, Senator Mark Miloscia proposed a bill to essentially ban Safe Injection Sites in Washington . Despite political resistance through failed legislation, there still persists a strong movement across major U.S. cities to legalize these sites . </P> <P> Existing laws and their vagueness hinder efforts toward legalizing SIS in the United States . For instance, the CSA deems drug possession and management of areas utilized for drug consumption illegal . With the legality of SIS in question, facilities offering similar and / or underground services operate in the United States . In Boston, the Supportive Place for Observation and Treatment (SPOT) program does not allow drug use on site, but practices harm reduction strategies . SPOT provides a space for intoxicated individuals to seek medical care, education, and support . In September 2014, a social service agency developed an underground SIS to evaluate the impact and feasibility of implementing SIS in the United States . With a drug injection room and an adjacent room for post-injection monitoring, this underground SIS closely follows the models of SIS in European countries . Though there are no legally sanctioned SIS in the United States, underground SIS and harm reduction programs currently provide services to prevent health consequences associated with injection drug use . </P> <P> While legislative efforts have been made to legalize and implement SIS for harm reduction, it remains a controversial issue and has been met with protests and petitions from the opposition . In Washington, critics pushed for the passage of Initiative - 27 which would ban the public funding of SIS in King County, but was subsequently ruled in the King County Superior Court as an infringement on the authority of the King County Board of Health . Opponents of the facilities argued that implementation of SIS would contradict the goal of preventing substance abuse . Other opposition groups in California took issue with the liability involved if an overdose were to occur, unsure if the patient or the healthcare staff would be responsible . In both San Francisco and Seattle, residents were most concerned about the location of SIS, afraid that the facility would increase crime rates in the surrounding area . Due to these and other opposing viewpoints, legislative efforts to implement SIS in the United States have been a slow progression . </P>

Which of the following would not be considered a form of harm reduction