<Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This section needs additional citations for verification . Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed . (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This section needs additional citations for verification . Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed . (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) </Td> </Tr> <Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="4"> Historical population </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Census </Th> <Th> Pop . </Th> <Th> </Th> <Th>% ± </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1790 </Td> <Td> 393,751 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td>--</Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1800 </Td> <Td> 478,103 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 21.4% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1810 </Td> <Td> 556,526 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 16.4% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1820 </Td> <Td> 638,829 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 14.8% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1830 </Td> <Td> 737,987 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 15.5% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1840 </Td> <Td> 753,419 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 2.1% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1850 </Td> <Td> 869,039 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 15.3% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1860 </Td> <Td> 992,622 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 14.2% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1870 </Td> <Td> 1,071,361 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 7.9% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1880 </Td> <Td> 1,399,750 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 30.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1890 </Td> <Td> 1,617,949 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 15.6% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1900 </Td> <Td> 1,893,810 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 17.1% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1910 </Td> <Td> 2,206,287 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 16.5% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1920 </Td> <Td> 2,559,123 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 16.0% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1930 </Td> <Td> 3,170,276 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 23.9% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1940 </Td> <Td> 3,571,623 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 12.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1950 </Td> <Td> 4,061,929 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 13.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1960 </Td> <Td> 4,556,155 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 12.2% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1970 </Td> <Td> 5,082,059 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 11.5% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1980 </Td> <Td> 5,881,766 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 15.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 1990 </Td> <Td> 6,628,637 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 12.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> 2000 </Td> <Td> 8,049,313 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 21.4% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> 9,535,471 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 18.5% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> Est. 2017 </Td> <Td> 10,273,419 </Td> <Td> </Td> <Td> 7.7% </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="4"> Source: 1910--2010 2016 estimate </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="4"> Historical population </Th> </Tr>

How far is durham nc from winston salem nc