<P> Hamilton, and especially Washington, distrusted the idea of an opposition party, as shown in George Washington's Farewell Address of 1796 . They thought opposition parties would only weaken the nation . By contrast Jefferson was the main force behind the creation and continuity of an opposition party . He deeply felt the Federalists represented aristocratic forces hostile to true republicanism and the true will of the people, as he explained in a letter to Henry Lee in 1824: </P> <P> Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties: 1 . Those who fear and distrust the people, and wish to draw all powers from them into the hands of the higher classes . 2 . Those who identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them, cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe, although not the most wise depositary of the public interests . In every country these two parties exist, and in every one where they are free to think, speak, and write, they will declare themselves . Call them, therefore, liberals and serviles, Jacobins and Ultras, whigs and tories, republicans and federalists, aristocrats and democrats, or by whatever name you please, they are the same parties still and pursue the same object . The last appellation of aristocrats and democrats is the true one expressing the essence of all ." </P> <P> Hofstadter (1970) shows it took many years for the idea to take hold that having two parties is better than having one, or none . That transition was made possible by the successful passing of power in 1801 from one party to the other . Although Jefferson systematically identified Federalist army officers and officeholders, he was blocked from removing all of them by protests from republicans . The Quids complained he did not go far enough . </P> <P> While historians are not unanimous, Princeton scholar Sean Wilentz in 2010 identified a scholarly trend very much in Hamilton's favor: </P>

Who were the main supporters of the federalist in the newly emerged two-party system