<Ol> <Li> Jump up ^ In C.S. Rowjee And Others vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), the petitioners accused the APSRTC of having acted mala fide under the orders of the Chief Minister, Sanjiva Reddy, in ordering the nationalisation of bus routes in the Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh . In its verdict, the Supreme Court observed "that (it was) to give effect to the wishes of the Chief Minister expressed (...) that the impugned schemes were formulated by the Corporation and therefore, it would be vitiated by malafides notwithstanding the interposition of the semi-autonomous corporation ." The Supreme Court also observed that the allegations (of "bias and personal ill - will against the appellants") were neither denied by the Chief Minister nor were affidavits stating the Government's position filed in the High Court . Further the Supreme Court observed that the counter-affidavits, while denying that the APSRTC was acting at the behest of the Chief Minister, failed to explain the choice of Kurnool district for nationalisation of the routes . In effect this was a condemnation of Reddy's role . </Li> <Li> Jump up ^ In Tej Kiran Jain And Others vs N. Sanjiva Reddy, the Supreme Court ruled that what MPs say in Parliament "is only subject to the discipline of the rules of Parliament, the good sense of the members and the control of proceedings by the Speaker . The courts have no say in the matter and should really have none ." The case dealt with certain references made against the Shankaracharya of Puri during a Calling Attention Motion introduced in the House . </Li> <Li> Jump up ^ Reddy's choice was between accepting the outgoing Prime Minister Charan Singh's advice of dissolving the Lok Sabha or giving Jagjivan Ram, leader of the Janata Party, the largest single bloc there, a chance of forming the government . Reddy was advised on the possibility of horse trading and accepted Singh's advice . Jagjivan Ram's claim to having a majority were overlooked and elections called prompting accusations of racial prejudice and political one upmanship against Reddy . </Li> </Ol> <Li> Jump up ^ In C.S. Rowjee And Others vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), the petitioners accused the APSRTC of having acted mala fide under the orders of the Chief Minister, Sanjiva Reddy, in ordering the nationalisation of bus routes in the Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh . In its verdict, the Supreme Court observed "that (it was) to give effect to the wishes of the Chief Minister expressed (...) that the impugned schemes were formulated by the Corporation and therefore, it would be vitiated by malafides notwithstanding the interposition of the semi-autonomous corporation ." The Supreme Court also observed that the allegations (of "bias and personal ill - will against the appellants") were neither denied by the Chief Minister nor were affidavits stating the Government's position filed in the High Court . Further the Supreme Court observed that the counter-affidavits, while denying that the APSRTC was acting at the behest of the Chief Minister, failed to explain the choice of Kurnool district for nationalisation of the routes . In effect this was a condemnation of Reddy's role . </Li> <Li> Jump up ^ In Tej Kiran Jain And Others vs N. Sanjiva Reddy, the Supreme Court ruled that what MPs say in Parliament "is only subject to the discipline of the rules of Parliament, the good sense of the members and the control of proceedings by the Speaker . The courts have no say in the matter and should really have none ." The case dealt with certain references made against the Shankaracharya of Puri during a Calling Attention Motion introduced in the House . </Li> <Li> Jump up ^ Reddy's choice was between accepting the outgoing Prime Minister Charan Singh's advice of dissolving the Lok Sabha or giving Jagjivan Ram, leader of the Janata Party, the largest single bloc there, a chance of forming the government . Reddy was advised on the possibility of horse trading and accepted Singh's advice . Jagjivan Ram's claim to having a majority were overlooked and elections called prompting accusations of racial prejudice and political one upmanship against Reddy . </Li>

To whom the president of india handing over his resignation