<P> With an aggregate of 1--1, AC Milan was declared the winner because they were the "away" side in the second game . In this example, as in many such cases, most tickets for each leg will be reserved for the "home" side's fans, so the designation was not totally arbitrary . </P> <P> Not all competitions with the away goals rule suffer from this anomaly, however: the Copa do Brasil has developed its rules to avoid some anomalies, such as the above . In that Cup, if two teams share either the same stadium or the same home town, neither is considered the home club and thus the away goals rule does not apply . This exception was seen, for example, in the 2006 final between Flamengo and Vasco, when both legs were played at the Maracanã Stadium . </P> <P> More anomalous was a qualification play - off for the 1991 World Youth Championship between Australia and Israel: Australia won on away goals even though, due to security concerns arising from the First Intifada, Israel's "home" leg was played in Australia . The same situation occurred in the 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification tie between the Bahamas and the British Virgin Islands, when the Bahamas advanced on the away goals rule even though both legs were played in the Bahamas . </P> <P> There has been at least one case of a wrong application of the away goals rule by a referee in an international club tournament . It happened in a second - round tie in the 1971--72 European Cup Winners' Cup between Rangers and Sporting Clube de Portugal . This fixture had the following scorelines: </P>

Is there head to head tie breaker in world cup