<P> It was, indeed, a way of life, which recognizes liberty, equality, and fraternity as the principles of life and which cannot be divorced from each other: Liberty cannot be divorced from equality; equality cannot be divorced from liberty . Nor can liberty and equality be divorced from fraternity . Without equality, liberty would produce the supremacy of the few over the many . Equality without liberty would kill individual initiative . Without fraternity, liberty and equality could not become a natural course of things . </P> <P> The Supreme Court of India originally stated in the BeruBari case presidential reference that the preamble is not an integral part of the Indian constitution, and therefore it is not enforceable in a court of law . However, the same court, in the 1973 Kesavananda case, overruled earlier decisions and recognised that the preamble may be used to interpret ambiguous areas of the constitution where differing interpretations present themselves . In the 1995 case of Union Government Vs LIC of India, the Supreme Court once again held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution . </P> <P> As originally enacted the preamble described the state as a "sovereign democratic republic", to which the terms "Secular" and "Socialist" were later added by the 42nd Amendment . </P> <P> The preamble - page, along with other pages of the original Constitution of India, was designed and decorated by the renowned painter Beohar Rammanohar Sinha of Jabalpur who was at Shantiniketan with acharya Nandalal Bose at that time . Nandalal Bose endorsed Beohar Rammanohar Sinha's artwork without any alteration whatsoever . As such, the page bears Beohar Rammanohar Sinha's short signature Ram in Devanagari lower - right corner . The calligraphy was done by Prem Behari Narain Raizada . </P>

Who proposed the idea of the preamble in the indian constitution