<P>... The word' strive' which occurs in the Draft Constitution, in judgement, is very important . We have used it because our intention is even when there are circumstances which prevent the Government, or which stand in the way of the Government giving effect to these Directive Principles, they shall, even under hard and unpropitious circumstances, always strive in the fulfilment of these Directives . That is why we have used the word' strive' . Otherwise, it would be open for any Government to say that the circumstances are so bad, that the finances are so inadequate that we cannot even make an effort in the direction in which the Constitution asks us to go . </P> <P> As per the constitution, as held by the court in the Three Judges Cases--(1982, 1993, 1998), a judge is appointed to the supreme court by the president on the recommendation of the collegium--a closed group of the Chief Justice of India, the four most senior judges of the court and the senior-most judge hailing from the high court of a prospective appointee . This has resulted in a Memorandum of Procedure being followed, for the appointments . </P> <P> Judges used to be appointed by the president on the advice of the union cabinet . After 1993 (the Second Judges' Case), no minister, or even the executive collectively, can suggest any names to the president, who ultimately decides on appointing them from a list of names recommended only by the collegium of the judiciary . Simultaneously, as held in that judgment, the executive was given the power to reject a recommended name . However, according to some, the executive has not been diligent in using this power to reject the names of bad candidates recommended by the judiciary . </P> <P> The collegium system has come under a fair amount of criticism . In 2015, the parliament passed a law to replace the collegium with a National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). This was struck down as unconstitutional by the supreme court, in the Fourth Judges' Case, as the new system would undermine the independence of the judiciary . Putting the old system of the collegium back, the court invited suggestions, even from the general public, on how to improve the collegium system, broadly along the lines of--setting up an eligibility criteria for appointments, a permanent secretariat to help the collegium sift through material on potential candidates, infusing more transparency into the selection process, grievance redressal and any other suggestion not in these four categories, like transfer of judges . This resulted in the court asking the government and the collegium to finalize the memorandum of procedure incorporating the above . </P>

Every judge of sc of india is appointed by
find me the text answering this question