<P> The OPLC announced on 11 February 2011, that West Ham had been selected as the preferred bidder for the Olympic Stadium, subject to the decision being ratified by Government departments and the Mayor of London . In a statement Tottenham Hotspur advised that as the deal was not yet concluded the club would continue to "monitor the situation". Spurs then applied for a judicial review to overturn the OPLC's decision, however this appeal was rejected in June 2011 </P> <P> The Olympic Legacy Company announced on 5 July 2011 that an independent review into the awarding of the Olympic Park Stadium to West Ham F.C. was to be carried out on its behalf by auditors Moore Stephens . This was a consequence of the discovery on 30 June 2011 that an employee of the Legacy Company, Dionne Knight, had been engaged by West Ham to carry out consultancy work relating to the Olympic Stadium without permission of the OPLC . The OPLC announced that Ms Knight had been suspended while a possible conflict of interest was investigated . </P> <P> It also became known that Ms Knight had already declared to the OPLC that she was in a personal relationship with a director of the football club . Meanwhile, Tottenham Hotspur announced it was seeking another judicial review of the decision to award the stadium to West Ham after the Olympics . </P> <P> On 24 August 2011, Tottenham and Leyton Orient won a review of the decision, being told that they had an arguable case . The review was due to take place on 18 October 2011 . However, on 11 October 2011 the deal to sell the stadium to West Ham collapsed . On 17 October 2011 it was announced by the government that Tottenham Hotspur (and Leyton Orient F.C.) had withdrawn legal action seeking a judicial review into the handing of the Olympic Stadium to West Ham . </P>

When is the new tottenham stadium being built