<Li> Is the asserted government interest substantial? </Li> <Li> Does the regulation directly advance the governmental interest asserted? </Li> <Li> Is the regulation more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest? </Li> <P> Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court, applying the Central Hudson standards in Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico (1986), affirmed the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico's conclusion that Puerto Rico's Games of Chance Act of 1948, including the regulations thereunder, was not facially unconstitutional . The lax interpretation of Central Hudson adopted by Posadas was soon restricted under 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996), when the Court invalidated a Rhode Island law prohibiting the publication of liquor prices . </P>

Which of the following statements is true of the free exercise clause of the first amendment