<Dl> <Dd> Part III, section 5, "Ambiguity," returns to the originating theme of the work, that each of us is both radically free, able to transcend himself or herself, and factical, constrained by that which just is what it is . How does one remain true to one's freedom while allowing others their own freedom, even if they make mistakes? Are we justified in telling the truth when another person finds the truth unbearable? We have to act in particular situations, "inventing an original solution" each time, but remembering that "man is man only through situations whose particularity is precisely a universal fact ." </Dd> </Dl> <Dd> Part III, section 5, "Ambiguity," returns to the originating theme of the work, that each of us is both radically free, able to transcend himself or herself, and factical, constrained by that which just is what it is . How does one remain true to one's freedom while allowing others their own freedom, even if they make mistakes? Are we justified in telling the truth when another person finds the truth unbearable? We have to act in particular situations, "inventing an original solution" each time, but remembering that "man is man only through situations whose particularity is precisely a universal fact ." </Dd> <P> The brief Conclusion sums up de Beauvoir's view of human freedom: "...we are absolutely free today if we choose to will our existence in its finiteness, a finiteness which is open on the infinite ." She ends with a call for us to realize and act on this fundamental truth of our existence . </P>

How does de beauvoir characterize human freedom in the ethics of ambiguity