<Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> Supreme Court of the United States </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Argued May 12--13, 1952 Decided June 2, 1952 </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Full case name </Th> <Td> Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, et al. v. Charles Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Citations </Th> <Td> 343 U.S. 579 (more) 72 S. Ct. 863; 96 L. Ed . 1153; 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2625; 21 Lab . Cas . (CCH) ¶ 67,008; 1952 Trade Cas . (CCH) ¶ 67,293; 62 Ohio L. Abs. 417; 47 Ohio Op. 430; 26 A.L.R. 2d 1378; 30 L.R.R.M. 2172 </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Prior history </Th> <Td> Injunction granted to plaintiffs, 103 F. Supp. 569 (D.D.C. 1952); injunctions stayed, 197 F. 2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1952); cert . granted, 343 U.S. 937 (1952) </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Holding </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> The President did not have the inherent authority to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under Article Two of the Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress . </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Court membership </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> <Dl> <Dt> Chief Justice </Dt> <Dd> Fred M. Vinson </Dd> <Dt> Associate Justices </Dt> <Dd> Hugo Black Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas Robert H. Jackson Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark Sherman Minton </Dd> </Dl> </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Case opinions </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Majority </Th> <Td> Black, joined by Frankfurter, Douglas, Jackson, Burton </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Frankfurter </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Douglas </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Jackson </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Burton </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Clark </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Dissent </Th> <Td> Vinson, joined by Reed, Minton </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Laws applied </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> U.S. Const . art . II </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer </Th> </Tr>

In youngstown co v sawyer the supreme court justices determined that
find me the text answering this question