<P> Constitutional privilege against self - incrimination </P> <Ul> <Li> This right has been incorporated against the states . <Ol> <Li> Self Incrimination in Court See Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964). </Li> <Li> Miranda See Miranda v. Arizona, 348 U.S. 436 (1966). </Li> </Ol> </Li> <Li> A note about the Miranda warnings: The text of the Fifth Amendment does not require that the police, before interrogating a suspect whom they have in custody, give him or her the now - famous Miranda warnings . Nevertheless, the Court has held that these warnings are a necessary prophylactic device, and thus required by the Fifth Amendment by police who interrogate any criminal suspect in custody, regardless of whether he or she is ultimately prosecuted in state or federal court . </Li> </Ul> <Li> This right has been incorporated against the states . <Ol> <Li> Self Incrimination in Court See Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964). </Li> <Li> Miranda See Miranda v. Arizona, 348 U.S. 436 (1966). </Li> </Ol> </Li> <Ol> <Li> Self Incrimination in Court See Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964). </Li> <Li> Miranda See Miranda v. Arizona, 348 U.S. 436 (1966). </Li> </Ol>

In which of the following supreme court cases did incorporation of constitutional rights apply