<P> Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard of proof in United States law that is less than probable cause, the legal standard for arrests and warrants, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or' hunch"'; it must be based on "specific and articulable facts", "taken together with rational inferences from those facts", and the suspicion must be associated with the specific individual . If police additionally have reasonable suspicion that a person so detained is armed and dangerous, they may "frisk" the person for weapons, but not for contraband like drugs . Reasonable suspicion is evaluated using the "reasonable person" or "reasonable officer" standard, in which said person in the same circumstances could reasonably suspect a person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity; it depends upon the totality of circumstances, and can result from a combination of particular facts, even if each is individually innocuous . </P> <P> In Terry v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a person can be stopped and briefly detained by a police officer based on a reasonable suspicion of involvement in a punishable crime . If the officer has reasonable suspicion the detainee is armed, the officer may perform a "pat - down" of the person's outer garments for weapons . Such a detention does not violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizure, though it must be brief . Reasonable suspicion does not provide grounds for arrest; however, an arrest can be made if facts discovered during the detention provide probable cause (Note: probable cause cannot be after the fact . Any added probable cause after the fact would be admissible in the court of law) that the suspect has committed a crime . </P>

Reasonable ground for believing that a person should be arrested or searched