<P> The relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law is disputed among international law scholars . This discussion forms part of a larger discussion on fragmentation of international law . While pluralist scholars conceive international human rights law as being distinct from international humanitarian law, proponents of the constitutionalist approach regard the latter as a subset of the former . In a nutshell, those who favors separate, self - contained regimes emphasize the differences in applicability; international humanitarian law applies only during armed conflict . On the other hand, a more systemic perspective explains that international humanitarian law represents a function of international human rights law; it includes general norms that apply to everyone at all time as well as specialized norms which apply to certain situations such as armed conflict between both state and military occupation (i.e. IHL) or to certain groups of people including refugees (e.g. the 1951 Refugee Convention), children (the Convention on the Rights of the Child), and prisoners of war (the 1949 Third Geneva Convention). </P> <P> The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action in 1993, in terms of which the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights was established . </P> <P> In 2006, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights was replaced with the United Nations Human Rights Council for the enforcement of international human rights law . </P> <P> The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a UN General Assembly declaration that does not in form create binding international human rights law . Many legal scholars cite the UDHR as evidence of customary international law . </P>

Who enforces the universal declaration of human rights