<Tr> <Th> Dissent </Th> <Td> Breyer, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Laws applied </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> U.S. Const . amend. II; D.C. Code § § 7 - 2502.02 (a) (4), 22--4504, 7--2507.02 </Td> </Tr> <P> District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self - defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully - owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee . It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated . Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states, which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are . It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self - defense . </P>

The outcome of the supreme court case (3 points)