<Dl> <Dd> The time is now past when accidents (Zufälle) could befall me; and what could not fall to my lot which would not already be mine own!" </Dd> </Dl> <Dd> The time is now past when accidents (Zufälle) could befall me; and what could not fall to my lot which would not already be mine own!" </Dd> <P> To cut it short, if it was always that "we choose a chance", then there would be determinism (for "we", "we ourselves" means: our will and its filtering and determining capabilities). And since it happens otherwise ("a chance chooses us"), then there is indeterminism . But the latter case means we have no will in a topic, i.e. it is at that time morally indifferent to us, adiaphora, not opposed to anything (and therefore even more there is no guilt). </P> <P> Since free will is discussed, it must obviously be some restricted reality (if "freedom" meant "everything," there would be no need for a separate word). What follows? That there must be events external to one's freedom: therefore, besides "free will" there should also consequently be "unfree will ." Although Nietzsche considers both terms entirely fictional, he gives some clues about the psychological reality behind them: </P>

Who said that free will is an illusion