<P> It would take almost two full years until the first French Constitution was signed on 3 September 1791, and it required another popular intervention to make it happen . Louis attempted to work within the framework of his limited powers after the women's march but won little support, and he and the royal family remained virtual prisoners in the Tuileries . Desperate, he made his abortive flight to Varennes in June 1791 . Attempting to escape and join up with royalist armies, the king was once again captured by a mixture of citizens and national guardsmen who hauled him back to Paris . Permanently disgraced, Louis was forced to accept a constitution more denuding of his kingship than any previously put forward . The spiral of decline in the king's fortunes culminated at the guillotine in 1793 . </P> <P> Even while the women were marching, suspicious eyes looked upon Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans, already behind the July uprisings, as being somehow responsible for the event . The Duke, a cousin of Louis XVI, was an energetic proponent of constitutional monarchy, and it was an open secret that he felt himself to be uniquely qualified to be king under such a system . Though allegations of his specific actions concerning the October march remain largely unproven, he has long been considered a significant instigator of the events . The Duke was certainly present as a deputy to the Assembly, and he was described by contemporaries as smiling warmly as he walked among the protesters at the height of the siege; many of them are said to have hailed him with greetings like "Here is our king! Long live King Orléans!" Many scholars believe that the Duke paid agents provocateurs to fan the discontent in the marketplaces and to conflate the women's march for bread with the drive to bring the king back to Paris . Others suggest he coordinated in some way with Mirabeau, the Assembly's most powerful statesman at the time, to use the marchers to advance the constitutionalist agenda . Still others go so far as to assert that the crowd was guided by such important Orléanist allies as Antoine Barnave, Choderlos de Laclos, and the duc d'Aiguillon, all dressed as poissardes in women's clothes . Yet most of the Revolution's foremost histories describe any involvement of the Duke as ancillary to the action, efforts of opportunism that neither created nor defined the October march . The Duke was investigated by the crown for complicity and none was proven . Still, the pall of suspicion helped convince him to take on Louis XVI's offer of a diplomatic mission conveniently outside the country . He returned to France the following summer and resumed his place in the Assembly where both he and Mirabeau were officially exonerated of any misdeeds regarding the march . As the Revolution moved forward into the Terror, the Duke's royal lineage and alleged avarice convicted him in the minds of radical leaders and he was sent to his execution in November 1793 . </P> <P> The women's march was a signal event of the French Revolution, its impact on par with the fall of the Bastille . For its inheritors, the march would stand as an inspirational example, emblematic of the power of popular movements . The occupation of the deputies' benches in the Assembly created a template for the future, forecasting the mob rule that would frequently influence successive Parisian governments . But it was the crudely decisive invasion of the palace itself that was most momentous; the attack removed forever the aura of invincibility that once cloaked the monarchy . It marked the end of the king's resistance to the tide of reform, and he made no further open attempts to push back the Revolution . As one historian states, it was "one of those defeats of royalty from which it never recovered". </P>

Who were the king and queen of france when the revolution broke out what happened to them