<P> Fee - for - service (FFS) is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately . In health care, it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care, rather than quality of care . However evidence of the effectiveness of pay - for - performance in improving health care quality is mixed, without conclusive proof that these programs either succeed or fail . https://hbr.org/2013/10/doubts-about-pay-for-performance-in-health-care Similarly, when patients are shielded from paying (cost - sharing) by health insurance coverage, they are incentivized to welcome any medical service that might do some good . FFS is the dominant physician payment method in the United States, and it raises costs, discourages the efficiencies of integrated care, and a variety of reform efforts have been attempted, recommended, or initiated to reduce its influence (such as moving towards bundled payments and capitation). In capitation, physicians are discouraged from performing procedures, including necessary ones, because they are not paid anything extra for performing them . In the Japanese health care system, FFS is mixed with a nationwide price setting mechanism (all - payer rate setting) to control costs . </P> <P> In the health insurance and the health care industries, FFS occurs if doctors and other health care providers receive a fee for each service such as an office visit, test, procedure, or other health care service . Payments are issued only after the services are provided . FFS is inflationary by raising health care costs . </P>

Fee-for-service is an accident and health insurance benefit payment model in which