<P> where EPC is the end plate current, g is the ionic conductance activated by acetylcholine, V is the membrane potential, and E is the reversal potential . When the membrane potential is equal to the reversal potential, V − E is equal to 0 and there is no driving force on the ions involved . </P> <P> When V is at the reversal potential (V − E is equal to 0), the identity of the ions that flow during an EPC can be deduced by comparing the reversal potential of the EPC to the equilibrium potential for various ions . For instance several excitatory ionotropic ligand - gated neurotransmitter receptors including glutamate receptors (AMPA, NMDA, and kainate), nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh), and serotonin (5 - HT) receptors are nonselective cation channels that pass Na and K in nearly equal proportions, giving an equilibrium potential close to zero . The inhibitory ionotropic ligand - gated neurotransmitter receptors that carry Cl, such as GABA and glycine receptors, have equilibrium potentials close to the resting potential (approximately--70 mV) in neurons . </P> <P> This line of reasoning led to the development of experiments (by Akira Takeuchi and Noriko Takeuchi in 1960) that proved that acetylcholine - activated ion channels are approximately equally permeable to Na and K ions . The experiment was performed by lowering the external Na concentration, which lowers (more negative) the Na equilibrium potential and produces a negative shift in reversal potential . Conversely, increasing the external K concentration raises (more positive) the K equilibrium potential and produces a positive shift in reversal potential . </P>

Is reversal potential the same as equilibrium potential