<Dd> Whoever the anonymous person was who deleted your statement about liters only being for fluids got it right . (Well, actually I'm just assuming you are the one who put it in there; it doesn't matter enough to me for me to go and confirm that--it's good riddance to misinformation in any case .) Gene Nygaard 01: 25, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) </Dd> <Dl> <Dd> In London (and possibly other parts of the UK) winkles - shellfish - were sold by the pint by street vendors. 86.200. 47.33 (talk)--Preceding undated comment added 12: 06, 9 January 2014 (UTC) </Dd> </Dl> <Dd> In London (and possibly other parts of the UK) winkles - shellfish - were sold by the pint by street vendors. 86.200. 47.33 (talk)--Preceding undated comment added 12: 06, 9 January 2014 (UTC) </Dd> <P> OK, I'll agree "for fluids" was incomplete . It is also incomplete to leave it open to use litres for measuring quantities like solid metals . </P>

Is a liter the same as a cubic meter