<Li> They are often biased, usually positively . People will write overly positive impressions of themselves, and often present opinions as facts . Wikipedia aims to avoid presenting opinions as facts . (Neutral point of view does not mean simply writing in the third person). </Li> <Li> They can be unverifiable . If the only source for a particular fact about you is yourself, then readers cannot verify it . (One common area where this is the case is with hopes, dreams, thoughts, and aspirations . There is no way for readers to verify what you think .) Everything in Wikipedia articles must be verifiable . </Li> <Li> They can contain original research . People often include in autobiographies information that has never been published before, or which is the result of firsthand knowledge . This type of information would require readers to perform primary research to verify it . Wikipedia does not distribute previously - unpublished information; original research is not permitted in Wikipedia . </Li> <P> Just because you honestly believe you are being neutral doesn't mean you are . Unconscious biases can and do exist, and are a very common cause of the problems with autobiographies--which is why we discourage autobiographies themselves and not just active, deliberate self - promotion . Not only does this affect neutrality but it also affects the verifiability and unoriginal research of the autobiography . One may inadvertently slip things in that one may not think need to be attributable even though they do, due to those very same biases . </P>

Can i make a wikipedia page for myself