<Li> In Saskatchewan, human rights complaints were filed against Bill Whatcott alleging that four pamphlets he distributed in Regina and Saskatoon in 2002 promoted hatred against individuals based on their sexual orientation . The complaints were upheld in 2005 by the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal, which ordered Whatcott to pay damages to each of the four complainants, totalling $17,500, and also ordered him not to publish similar pamphlets . Whatcott appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, which dismissed the appeal in 2007 . However, in February 2010, Whatcott succeeded in his appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, which found that the pamphlets did not infringe the hate publication provision of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code . Part of the judgment allowing his appeal commented that the pamphlets related to "...the manner in which children in the public school system are to be exposed to messages about different forms of sexuality and sexual identity ." The judgment went to say: "This is beyond question an important matter of public policy and it is inherently controversial . It must always be open to public debate . That debate will sometimes be polemical and impolite ." The Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada . In February 2013, the Court allowed the Commission's appeal in Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v Whatcott and held that, although Bible passages, biblical beliefs and the principles derived from those beliefs can be legally and reasonably advanced in public discourse, extreme manifestations of the emotion described by the words "detestation" and "vilification" cannot be . </Li> <P> Freedom of speech in Cuba is guaranteed by Article 53 of the Constitution of Cuba, and freedom of association by Article 54 . These read: </P> <P> Citizens have freedom of speech and of the press in keeping with the objectives of socialist society . Material conditions for the exercise of that right are provided by the fact that the press, radio, television, movies and other organs of the mass media are State or social property and can never be private property . This assures their use at the exclusive service of the working people and in the interest of society . The law regulates the exercise of these freedoms . </P> <P> The rights of assembly, demonstration and association are exercised by workers, both manual and intellectual; peasants; women; students; and other sectors of the working people, (rights) to which they have the necessary ability (los medios necesarios) to exercise . The social and mass organizations have all the facilities they need to carry out those activities in which the members have full freedom of speech and opinion based on the unlimited right of initiative and criticism . </P>

Is there freedom of speech in the uk