<Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Miranda v. Arizona </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> Supreme Court of the United States </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Decided June 13, 1966 </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Full case name </Th> <Td> Miranda v. State of Arizona; Westover v. United States; Vignera v. State of New York; State of California v. Stewart </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Citations </Th> <Td> 384 U.S. 436 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1602; 16 L. Ed . 2d 694; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2817; 10 A.L.R. 3d 974 </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Argument </Th> <Td> Oral argument </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Prior history </Th> <Td> Defendant . Superior Ct.; affirmed, 401 P. 2d 721 (Ariz . 1965); cert . granted, 382 U.S. 925 (1965) </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Subsequent history </Th> <Td> Retrial on remand, defendant convicted, Ariz . Superior Ct.; affirmed, 450 P. 2d 364 (Ariz . 1969); rehearing denied, Ariz . Supreme Ct . March 11, 1969; cert . denied, 396 U.S. 868 (1969) </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Holding </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> The Fifth Amendment right against self - incrimination requires law enforcement officials to advise a suspect interrogated in custody of his or her rights to remain silent and to obtain an attorney . Supreme Court of Arizona reversed and remanded . </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Court membership </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> <Dl> <Dt> Chief Justice </Dt> <Dd> Earl Warren </Dd> <Dt> Associate Justices </Dt> <Dd> Hugo Black William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan Jr . Potter Stewart Byron White Abe Fortas </Dd> </Dl> </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Case opinions </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Majority </Th> <Td> Warren, joined by Black, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concur / dissent </Th> <Td> Clark </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Dissent </Th> <Td> Harlan, joined by Stewart, White </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Dissent </Th> <Td> White, joined by Harlan, Stewart </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Laws applied </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> U.S. Const . amends . V, XIV </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Miranda v. Arizona </Th> </Tr>

How did miranda v. arizona change the way law enforcement treated criminal defendants
find me the text answering this question