<Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents . Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article . Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page . (July 2011) </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Td> </Td> <Td> This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents . Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article . Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page . (July 2011) </Td> </Tr> <P> Evolutionary psychology has generated substantial controversy and criticism . The criticism--which has been most forceful from proponents of constructivist, postmodernist and poststructuralist schools of thought--includes but is not limited to: disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, alternatives to some of the cognitive assumptions (such as massive modularity) frequently employed in evolutionary psychology, alleged vagueness stemming from evolutionary assumptions (such as uncertainty about the environment of evolutionary adaptation), differing stress on the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, and political and ethical issues . </P> <P> While evolutionary psychology has been accused of straw man evidence, ideologically rather than scientifically motivated, evolutionary psychologists respond by arguing that these criticisms are also straw men, are based on an incorrect nature versus nurture dichotomy, or are based on misunderstandings of the discipline . </P>

What are two common criticisms of evolutionary psychology