<Li> The remedy of exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence, the exclusionary rule, has been incorporated against the states . See Mapp v. Ohio . In Mapp, the Court overruled Wolf v. Colorado in which the Court had ruled that the exclusionary rule did not apply to the states . </Li> <Ul> <Li> The various warrant requirements have been incorporated against the states . See Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964). </Li> <Li> The standards for judging whether a search or seizure undertaken without a warrant was "unreasonable" also have been incorporated against the states . See Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963). </Li> </Ul> <Li> The various warrant requirements have been incorporated against the states . See Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964). </Li> <Li> The standards for judging whether a search or seizure undertaken without a warrant was "unreasonable" also have been incorporated against the states . See Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963). </Li>

The incorporation doctrine is also known as the doctrine of incorporation