<P> This 16th century debate drew on a texts witnessing a counterpart debate in the 4th and 5th centuries; occasioned by the awareness that the translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek, which the early church used as its standard Old Testament, included several books not recognised in the Jewish canon of the bible as it had since been defined in Rabbinic Judaism . In this debate, which had preceded the dissemination of Jerome's Vulgate version, the books in the Hebrew bible had been termed' canonical'; the additional books that were recognised by the Christian churches had been termed' ecclesiastical', and those that were considered not to be in the Bible were termed' apocryphal' . </P> <P> Forms of the term' deuterocanonical' were adopted after the 16th century by the Eastern Orthodox Church to denote canonical books of the Septuagint not in the Hebrew Bible (a wider selection than that adopted by the Council of Trent), and also by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church to apply to works believed to be of Jewish origin translated in the Old Testament of the Ethiopic Bible; a wider selection still . </P> <P> Most protestant churches have, since the 16th century accepted only works in the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew bible as canonical books of the Old Testament, and hence classify all deuterocanonical texts (of whichever definition) with the Apocrypha . </P> <P> Philip Schaff says that "the Council of Hippo in 393, and the third (according to another reckoning the sixth) Council of Carthage in 397, under the influence of Augustine, who attended both, fixed the catholic canon of the Holy Scriptures, including the Apocrypha of the Old Testament,...This decision of the transmarine church however, was subject to ratification; and the concurrence of the Roman see it received when Innocent I and Gelasius I (AD 414) repeated the same index of biblical books . Schaff says that this canon remained undisturbed till the sixteenth century, and was sanctioned by the Council of Trent at its fourth session," although as the Catholic Encyclopedia reports, "in the Latin Church, all through the Middle Ages we find evidence of hesitation about the character of the deuterocanonicals...Few are found to unequivocally acknowledge their canonicity," but that the countless manuscript copies of the Vulgate produced by these ages, with a slight, probably accidental, exception, uniformly embrace the complete Roman Catholic Old Testament . </P>

Which books of the catholic bible are not in a protestant bible
find me the text answering this question