<Dl> <Dd> i.e. about 2 if the number of ravens in existence is known to be large . But the factor if we see a white shoe is only </Dd> </Dl> <Dd> i.e. about 2 if the number of ravens in existence is known to be large . But the factor if we see a white shoe is only </Dd> <Dl> <Dd> <Dl> <Dd> <Dl> <Dd> N − b N / average (N − b − 1 N, N − b − 2 N,..., max (0, N − b − r N)) (\ displaystyle (\ tfrac (N-b) (N)) (\ Big /) (\ text (average)) \ left ((\ tfrac (N-b - 1) (N)), (\ tfrac (N-b - 2) (N)),...\, \ max (0, (\ tfrac (N-b-r) (N))) \ right)) </Dd> </Dl> </Dd> </Dl> </Dd> </Dl> <Dd> <Dl> <Dd> <Dl> <Dd> N − b N / average (N − b − 1 N, N − b − 2 N,..., max (0, N − b − r N)) (\ displaystyle (\ tfrac (N-b) (N)) (\ Big /) (\ text (average)) \ left ((\ tfrac (N-b - 1) (N)), (\ tfrac (N-b - 2) (N)),...\, \ max (0, (\ tfrac (N-b-r) (N))) \ right)) </Dd> </Dl> </Dd> </Dl> </Dd>

How bayesian confirmation theory handles the paradox of the ravens