<P> The Wade--Davis Bill emerged from a plan introduced in the Senate by Ira Harris of New York in February, 1863 . It proposed to base the Reconstruction of the South on the government's power to guarantee a republican form of government . The Wade--Davis Bill was also important for national and congressional power . Although federally imposed conditions of reconstruction retrospectively seem logical, there was a widespread belief that southern Unionism would return the seceded states to the Union after the Confederacy's military power was broken . This belief was not fully abandoned until later in 1863 . The provisions, critics complained, were virtually impossible to meet, thus making it likely there would be permanent national control over the states formerly in rebellion . </P> <P> Those voting for passage in the Senate numbered 18: Messrs. Anthony (R), Chandler (R), Clark (R), Conness (R), Foot (R), Harlan (R), Harris (R), Howe, Lane of Kansas (R), Morgan (R), Pomeroy (R), Ramsey (R), Sherman (R), Sprague (R), Sumner (R), Wade (R), Wilkinson (R), Wilson (R). Those voting against passage numbered 14: Messrs. Buckalew (D), Carlile (U), Davis (UU), Doolittle (R), Henderson (UU), Hendricks (D), Lane of Indiana (R), McDougall (D), Powell (D), Riddle (D), Saulsbury (D), Ten Eyck (R), Trumbull (R), Van Winkle (UU). </P> <Table> <Tr> <Th> Party </Th> <Th> Yes </Th> <Th> No </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> Republican </Td> <Td> 18 </Td> <Td> </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> Democrat </Td> <Td> 0 </Td> <Td> 6 </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> Unconditional Unionist </Td> <Td> 0 </Td> <Td> </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td> Unionist </Td> <Td> 0 </Td> <Td> </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Th> Party </Th> <Th> Yes </Th> <Th> No </Th> </Tr>

Which of the following were provisions of the wade-davis bill