<Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Crawford v. Washington </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> Supreme Court of the United States </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Argued November 10, 2003 Decided March 8, 2004 </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Full case name </Th> <Td> Michael D. Crawford v. Washington </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Citations </Th> <Td> 541 U.S. 36 (more) 124 S. Ct. 1354; 158 L. Ed . 2d 177; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1838; 72 U.S.L.W. 4229; 63 Fed . R. Evid . Serv . (Callaghan) 1077; 17 Fla . L. Weekly Fed . S 181 </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Prior history </Th> <Td> Defendant convicted, Thurston County Superior Court, 11 - 19 - 99; reversed, 107 Wn . App . 1025 (2001); reversed, conviction reinstated, 54 P. 3d 656 (Wash. 2002); certiorari granted, 539 U.S. 914 (2003) </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Subsequent history </Th> <Td> None </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Holding </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> The use at trial of out of court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him . </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Court membership </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> <Dl> <Dt> Chief Justice </Dt> <Dd> William Rehnquist </Dd> <Dt> Associate Justices </Dt> <Dd> John P. Stevens Sandra Day O'Connor Antonin Scalia Anthony Kennedy David Souter Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer </Dd> </Dl> </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Case opinions </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Majority </Th> <Td> Scalia, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th> Concurrence </Th> <Td> Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Laws applied </Th> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> U.S. Const . amend . VI </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings </Td> </Tr> <Tr> <Td_colspan="2"> Ohio v. Roberts (1980) </Td> </Tr> </Table> <Tr> <Th_colspan="2"> Crawford v. Washington </Th> </Tr>

What did the supreme court hold in crawford v. washington (2004)
find me the text answering this question