<Li> Inclusive: As many stakeholders as possible should be involved in the consensus decision - making process . </Li> <Li> Participatory: The consensus process should actively solicit the input and participation of all decision - makers . </Li> <P> Consensus decision - making is an alternative to commonly practiced group decision - making processes . Robert's Rules of Order, for instance, is a guide book used by many organizations . This book allows the structuring of debate and passage of proposals that can be approved through majority vote . It does not emphasize the goal of full agreement . Critics of such a process believe that it can involve adversarial debate and the formation of competing factions . These dynamics may harm group member relationships and undermine the ability of a group to cooperatively implement a contentious decision . Consensus decision - making attempts to address the beliefs of such problems . Proponents claim that outcomes of the consensus process include: </P> <Ul> <Li> Better decisions: Through including the input of all stakeholders the resulting proposals may better address all potential concerns . </Li> <Li> Better implementation: A process that includes and respects all parties, and generates as much agreement as possible sets the stage for greater cooperation in implementing the resulting decisions . </Li> <Li> Better group relationships: A cooperative, collaborative group atmosphere can foster greater group cohesion and interpersonal connection . </Li> </Ul>

Who is the ultimate decision maker of any proposal made to a committee