<P> On February 9, 1931, New Jersey Representative Randolph Perkins introduced legislation for a Washington quarter, to the dismay of the Bicentennial Committee and Fine Arts Commission . The House of Representatives Committee on Coinage, Weights and Measures issued a memorandum stating that the design of the existing Standing Liberty quarter had been found to be unsatisfactory, and that the new piece would not only be struck for 1932, it would permanently replace the older design . Thus, a new quarter would both be a tribute to Washington on his bicentennial, and relieve the Mint of the burden of having to coin a difficult - to - strike piece . On February 12, Fine Arts Commission Chairman Charles W. Moore wrote to the House Committee, objecting to the change of denomination, and proposing that they mandate that Laura Fraser's design for the medal also appear on the coin . Moore was ignored, and Congress passed authorizing legislation for a Washington quarter on March 4, 1931 . The act provided that Washington's image, to appear on the obverse, was to be based on the "celebrated bust" of the former president by Jean - Antoine Houdon; Fraser had based her design on Houdon's work . </P> <P> On July 14, 1931, Assistant Mint Director Mary Margaret O'Reilly wrote to Moore, asking the Commission's advice on a design competition for the new quarter . Moore replied, stating that as Fraser had won the competition for the medal, she should adapt her design for the quarter . Secretary Mellon responded to Moore, stating that as the Treasury had been no party to the earlier design agreement, it was not bound by it, and would not follow it . The Treasury proceeded to hold a design competition, and when the Fine Arts Commission met to consider the submitted designs in an advisory role, it selected those submitted by Fraser . The designs were submitted to Mellon in November 1931; he selected Flanagan's design and notified Moore of the decision . Moore and commission member Adolph Weinman (who had designed the Mercury dime and Walking Liberty half dollar) attempted to get Mellon to change his mind, but only got him to agree to allow the various sculptors more time to improve their entries--they had asked for more time just for Fraser . On January 20, 1932, following resubmissions, the commission affirmed its support of the Fraser designs . </P> <P> Mellon left office on February 12, 1932; he was succeeded by Ogden L. Mills . With a new Secretary of the Treasury in office, Moore renewed his protest, sending Mills a letter on March 31 deprecating Flanagan's design and urging the new secretary to accede to the commission's recommendation . Mills had already been briefed by O'Reilly on the quarter matter, and responded to Moore on April 11 . Secretary Mills informed Moore that the chairman's letter had caused him to request changes from the sculptor, but that he would not override Mellon's decision . On April 16, the selection of Flanagan's designs was publicly announced . </P> <P> Mellon was aware of which artists had submitted which designs, and has been accused of discriminating against Fraser as a woman . Numismatic historian Walter Breen stated, "it has been learned that Mellon knew all along who had submitted the winning models, and his male chauvinism partly or wholly motivated his unwillingness to let a woman win ." Bowers, however, noted that Mellon had approved Fraser's designs for commemorative coins several times, as well as those by other women, and that no contemporary source speaks to any bias on Mellon's part . Bowers called the belief "modern numismatic fiction". Fraser's design was used in 1999 as a commemorative half eagle issued 200 years after Washington's death . </P>

What is on the tail side of a quarter