<P> The dissent may disagree with the majority for any number of reasons: a different interpretation of the existing case law, the application of different principles, or a different interpretation of the facts . Many legal systems do not provide for a dissenting opinion and provide the decision without any information regarding the discussion between judges or its outcome . </P> <P> A dissent in part is a dissenting opinion that disagrees selectively--specifically, with one part of the majority holding . In decisions that require holdings with multiple parts due to multiple legal claims or consolidated cases, judges may write an opinion "concurring in part and dissenting in part". </P> <P> In some courts, such as the Supreme Court of the United States, the majority opinion may be broken down into numbered or lettered parts, which allows those judges "dissenting in part" to easily identify which parts they join with the majority, and which sections they do not . </P> <P> In the mid-20th century, it became customary for the members of the U.S. Supreme Court and many state supreme courts to end their dissenting opinions with a variation on the phrase "I respectfully dissent ." </P>

What is an example of the use of judicial review in the majority opinion or the dissent