<Li> What is the known or potential rate of error? </Li> <Li> Do standards exist for the control of the technique's operation? </Li> <Li> Has the technique been generally accepted within the relevant scientific community? </Li> <P> The Supreme Court explicitly cautioned that the Daubert list should not be regarded by judges as "a definitive checklist or test ..." Yet in practice, judges have judged the admissibility of scientific evidence using the "Daubert factors" as a checklist; for example, the trial court judge in Kumho admitted to erroneously treating the factors as mandatory . </P>

List the 5 daubert factors that judges need to consider in order to admit the evidence