<P> Apart from the remains, archaeologists also found stone (bifacial small core) or fleck tools in the same section of the individuals at least 32 of them and other 5,500 flakes per cubic meter on another section nearby . In addition, there is also a formal component found only with evidence of juvenile Stegodon and komodo dragon, including points, perforators, blades and microblade that were probably hafted as barbs in which these tools indicate a selective hunting method . Although these stone artifacts seem to suggest the possibilities that these individuals use them, archaeologists are unable to establish which human species manufactured them since similar flakes tools and the remains of juvenile Stegodon and komodo dragon are also found at the Soa Basin sites nearby as well . Despite this fact, the cognitive ability of H. floresiensis should not be underestimated . In addition, all evidence suggests another possibility of this species that they were able to migrate across the Wallace line into the Wallacean province in which according to geographical setting it was difficult to do . Nevertheless, scholars seem to agree that this H. floresiensis represent a species different from H. erectus and H. sapiens and overlapping with the presence of both in the region, raising the possibility that these species might have lived among each other before modern human fully colonized the region later on . </P> <P> In Asia, most recent late archaic human fossils were found from China (125 - 100 ka), the Philippines (58 - 24 ka), Malaysia (c. 40 ka), and Sri Lanka (c. 36 ka). The artifacts from these sites include partial skeleton, crania, deep skull, and other related skeletons indicate that modern human migrated to Asia earlier than the western theory might have discussed . </P> <P> In 2009 archaeologists discovered the partial cranium and some teeth of a modern human at Tam Pa Ling in mainland Laos which shed light on the understanding of anatomically modern human migration and evolution in the region during the Late Pleistocene Period . The site is located in Houaphanh Province, around 170 miles north of Vientiane, the capital city of modern Laos . Within this site, only human remains were found, but there is no evidence of human occupation or other artifacts . The radiocarbon dating of the charcoal and the sediment dating analyses identify the remains to date at least c. 56.5 ka, while the dental artifacts from the remains that analyzed by the isotope - ratio measurement indicate c. 63.6 ka . The analysis of the cranium and dentition of the remains suggest that these remains are the early modern human population in Southeast Asia . This date is older than the fossils that were found in Niah cave in Malaysia which offers another explanation for human evolution in Southeast Asia . </P> <P> In addition to the discovery in Laos, there are also a number of human remains and related artifacts found across mainland Southeast Asia in which it suggests the new ideas of the regional Late Pleistocene development as well . More teeth and molar that were found in Thailand and Vietnam sites (Tham Wihan Naki, Thailand; Tham Kuyean, Vietnam, and etc .) indicate transitions between H. erectus and H. sapiens . In fact, these remains might indicate the possible interbreeding between H. erectus and H. sapiens, such as the tooth at Wihan Nakin at Chaiyaphum province in Thailand . </P>

Which of the following genus of hominin is found in asia